« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »

January 28, 2007

The Fenice comes through...

Consider this blog an addendum to the most recent one. If you read my last blog, you will recall my varied opinions of opera-goers in some selected venues in the US and Europe.The first on my list was the Fenice here in Venice and I gave it B- for dress standards (worse for production standards, but that's another topic).    

Gazz3_3

Lo! and Behold! The Fenice agrees with me and has has instituted, announced yesterday, a ties-only policy. The power of the Blog, I say. Here is today's local paper's headline which says, "In a tie at the Fenice, same as La Scala". And not only a tie, but also a jacket is required...maybe there is hope, hunh?

January 25, 2007

The way some people dress...

Goose2_1

I was at our fishmonger yesterday morning in Campo S. Margherita. While waiting for my salmon to be cut and wrapped, I watched a stream of university students, mostly women, hurriedly walking to classes (I presume). About 40 passed me by in the 7 minutes I waited for the fish. Every one of them, I mean every one, wore jeans. Every one (with one exception) wore a black coat or jacket. No differentiation. No personality, no individuality. No style. No nuttin'. Lemmings to the sea. Italian fashion, indeed. The fish lying in repose on ice at the fishmonger had loads more style. Sheeesh!

It made me begin to think about dress standards in general and in particular to the headfirst free-fall thereof. But surely there is a safe haven for those who wish to appear elegant and to associate with those similarly like-minded...of course there is, the opera!

The above was by way of introduction to my rating of opera venues and the quality of dress of those who attend.

Let's start with the Fenice in Venice where we live. Surely going to the opera is a must for dressing up, no? Not any more. In Venice the majority do wear suits and dresses but there is always a minority of casualties, people who treat the opera as they do going to the cinema or into the kitchen. Give Venice an B.

At the Met in New York... well, you have to realise that 50% of the attendees are business people visiting New York who get the tickets from their law firm or investment bankers. So business attire predominates. But nothing is uniform, so to speak. A few years back we saw a great Traviata with Renee Fleming. We were twenty-five rows back in the orchestra section and the 60ish man next to me wore a tee shirt and jeans. New York gets a B-.

The best dressed audience we have seen was undoubtedly in Munich. Very elegant. The only people who made no effort (a small minority) were American groupies of countertenor David Daniels (who was the reason we went). It was a Handel opera set in a US Army quonsat hut and Daniels wore army fatigues, clearly he was his fans' role model. Give Munich an A+, nevertheless. Give the set designer a F.

Covent Garden rates a C-. Young people at the opera in London are one level above slobs. No sense of occasion. And of course it is the sense of occasion which heightens the pleasure of an event, whether an opera, a dinner party, a cocktail party. Or maybe it's the £200 tickets? These events are different from a dreary dinner at home, or a pizza at the local restaurant, or a football match. Dressing properly pays due respect to the hosts, to the fellow attendees and to the event. Surely the joy of life is differentiation: things vary, "a time to weep and a time to laugh" as Ecclesiastes reminds us. Or listen to this from the Irish poet Louis MacNeice who rejoices in..."the drunkenness of things being various."

Statsopera in Vienna gets an A. Even some formal wear. Also, while we are at it, give Vienna another A for production values. (Fenice take note.)

Paris. The Parisians are known for their elegance and style and rightly so. Tourists to Paris are not unlike tourists everywhere and therefore are not known for their elegance and style. But I would say the average was raised by the locals so let's give Paris a B.

Salzburg. Conservative, organised, well dressed. A

I'll leave the music criticism to those better informed. Ciao.

January 20, 2007

British Pantomine in Venice

Goose2_097 

For those of you who may have been following my wife's blog which has recently been focusing on the pantomime she wrote, directed, and produced here, I thought I'd provide to you my completely unbiased perspective.

It had three sellout performances last week (sellout meaning full house as a donation to a church was the entry fee).

First of all, you American readers should not confuse British Pantomime with any of that tediously boring and noiseless schtick of Marcel Marceau. British Panto is filled with noise: cheering, booing, singing, dance, hissing, laughter and melodrama. With Marceau one occasionally may smile but then look at one's watch.

Laurie's panto was Mother Goose, a stock character in the panto world. It had some Venetian threads to it. The venue was our local theatre at Santa Margherita (capacity 320). I am not sure of the historical underpinnings of panto, but there are similarities between it and Italian Commedia dell'arte (standard characters, exaggerated language, behaviour and costumes, music, corny and witty jokes) so our Venetian audience was not totally at sea. The majority of the audience, however, were British and American, mostly expats and tourists, and some who travelled here for the show.

There is a university here in Venice and the University English department agreed to sponsor the venue (we still paid about €800) with the expectation that an English show would be of interest to its students. Hah! The university English department here is quite large but those who came to the show were a handful. Not unexpected. Being a student here means passing tests, spending time in bars and not attending cultural events which are surplus to getting through. Although, full credit to some headmistresses of local grammar schools who brought about two hundred 9 to 13 year olds to the morning performance. (My next blog will talk about university students here in Venice.)    

The panto was a huge success, critically and financially (€1800 to the beneficiciary, St George's Anglican Church Roof Fund). The actors were superb, the direction excellent, the costumes, dance and music were grand. Brava Laurie!

Laurie says never again, but she said that three years ago.